Archive

Archive for April, 2011

Summer fun on the way, but so is potential for Las Vegas defective lawnmower injury

April 30th, 2011 No comments

As we transition into May, temperatures in Nevada are expected to heat up and before we know it the winter months of windbreaker jackets and chilly mornings will be a distant memory. For many homeowners in Las Vegas, this change in the weather means dusting off the garden shears and gassing up the lawnmower. The thrills of summer and the joys of home maintenance, however, can be diminished by the threat or even the experience of Las Vegas defective lawnmower accidents.

If that sounds like a remote possibility, think again. Lawnmowers have come a long way from the manual, single-axle push mowers of yesteryear. Today’s lawnmower technology is super-powered by comparison, and the potential for Nevada personal injury accidents is much greater. The powerful rotating blades of a gas-powered lawnmower are a threat to hands when they are sharpened, and even when dull they can damage irrigation and fling rocks and debris without warning but with great force. Many operators of gas-powered mowers — which often have a two-stroke engine that is different from that of an automobile — have a limited understanding of internal-combustion engines beyond “I put gas in and it moves,” which can pose a hazard if negligent manufacturers are not conscientious about providing clear instructions for maintaining these devices.

A popular new alternative to gas-powered mowers are electric-motor lawnmowers, but these also involve risks. Users need clear instructions for charging and caring for an electric mower battery, information that can be in short supply. Another recent trend is the rise of the ride-on mower, which lessens the monotony of pacing back and forth with an old-style mower and which also makes the chore more manageable for homeowners with large expanses of sod. However, recent months have seen recalls issued for thousands of ride-on mowers due to serious safety risks. Nearly 4,000 ZRT model mowers by manufacturer Toro have been recalled after reports of a faulty switch that can activate as the operator exits the seat and power the machine on. And mower company Exmark issued a recall for 750 of its Pioneer S-series models over concerns that wiring problems could impair steering ability, possibly resulting in serious Nevada defective product injuries.

Our Las Vegas personal injury attorneys know that accidents strike at the moments we least expect them, and that is why we dedicate our practice to serving Nevada clients who have suffered serious injuries or wrongful death due to the negligent acts or faulty products of corporations. Contact us today for a free consultation about your case.

Share and Enjoy

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Delicious
  • LinkedIn
  • StumbleUpon
  • Add to favorites
  • Email
  • RSS

Las Vegas offers theme-park thrills, risks of personal injury

April 29th, 2011 No comments

For decades Las Vegas has been building its reputation as the country’s play-place: first as an outpost of loose divorce laws, then as an unrivaled territory offering legalized prostitution and gambling, and now merging all this and more as it presents itself as a tourist destination for those seeking to push the limits of vice and wonder and largesse. But as a few recent incidents reveal, Nevada casinos that open their doors to all comers for all things entertainment do so at a risk of Nevada personal injury lawsuits.

In one case, a patron of a thrill ride fell from his seat and lost his life. Ride operators remain baffled by the case — they say that the ill-fated car returned to the launch area with its safety restraints still in place as they should have been — but the man’s family have filed a wrongful death lawsuit and are alleging that the ride’s operators/owners failed to take adequate care to avoid this tragedy. Roller coasters and other Las Vegas thrill rides are some of the newest additions to the city’s vast panoply of entertainment, but safety has to come before glamor and profits.

Adding a family-friendly element to the Strip, Nevada visitors can now enjoy the city’s monorail. These devices balance the power and speed of a locomotive with the whimsy of a futuristic craft, but that does not make them harmless and the risk of Las Vegas monorail injuries is very real. An accident at a famous theme park in 2009 resulted in a wrongful death lawsuit that recently settled for an undisclosed amount after a theme-park employee was struck by a monorail car moving rapidly in reverse.

We hope Clark County residents and out-of-state tourists alike will make happy, productive use of the many exciting amenities in our great city and that Las Vegas can begin to get back some of the “mojo” that it has lost in recent years as the economy has soured. But this rebirth has to come about without an attendant rise in injuries to the people seeking this entertainment. If you or a loved one have been hurt in a Las Vegas casino accident, contact our firm today for a free consultation about your case.

Share and Enjoy

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Delicious
  • LinkedIn
  • StumbleUpon
  • Add to favorites
  • Email
  • RSS

A knowledgeable Nevada personal injury attorney is vital for your trucking accident lawsuit

April 29th, 2011 No comments

When a loved one is hurt in a Nevada semi-truck accident, the harsh reality is that the next steps are likely to be long and heavy. Because of the size, weight, and rigidity of today’s commercial trucking vehicles, passenger automobiles involved in car accidents with them are often subjected to tremendous force with destructive results.

Many Las Vegas 18-wheeler lawsuits are brought by surviving family members because the primary victim(s) have been killed or gravely injured. Our hope for readers is that their lives will never be touched by one of these tragic incidents or that any injuries suffered be of the more remote, less severe variety. But irrespective of who has been harmed and to what extent, the purpose of a post-accident lawsuit is to appropriately place responsibility on those who have acted recklessly and to help rebuild the affected families. Hundreds of people are hurt in Nevada motor vehicle accidents every year in our state, with injuries ranging from minor bruises to major spinal cord and back injuries.

Determining where evidence of negligence lies is ultimately for your Nevada personal injury attorney to present cogently and for a jury to decide. However, an understanding of the regulatory landscape surrounding commercial trucking is helpful in identifying some of the key areas of focus that an experienced lawyer will pursue. The Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration (FMCSA) issued a new safety program in 2010 that marked a major step toward greater oversight of one of the nation’s most important — but potentially most lethal — industries. Without getting bogged down in the details, the new program (known as Compliance Safety Accountability, or CSA) aims to replace the prior, outdated model with a more dynamic, intelligent way of assessing trucking companies’ safety records. The new protocols replace periodic snapshots of companies’ safety profiles with a rolling 24-month window of data that is updated monthly and which places different weights on seven major safety criteria including drivers’ fatigue, substance use, and well-being and a vehicle fleet’s maintenance records and crash history. Other developments place new constraints on hiring by trucking companies and appropriate preparation for new long-haul drivers. CSA also created a standard, nine-level intervention regime to guide federal responses to non-compliance.

Our Las Vegas big-rig accident lawyers learn the latest details about changes to the regulations and standards affecting long-haul trucking. Our interest is not merely academic — by understanding what is expected of trucking companies, we can be effective in helping our clients determine when they have been harmed by corporate negligence or even commercial activity in violation of federal law. Building the case on these grounds is a vital part of a successful Nevada wrongful death lawsuit, and doing solid investigative work is the basis of our dedicated practice. Call us today for a consultation and to learn more.

Share and Enjoy

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Delicious
  • LinkedIn
  • StumbleUpon
  • Add to favorites
  • Email
  • RSS

When the rubber hits the road, Nevada automobile accidents turn on child car seat failure

April 26th, 2011 No comments

A popular turn of phrase is ”when the rubber hits the road,” which is used to distinguish a theory or hypothesis or prediction from empiricism or reality. When our firm handles tire tread separation lawsuits, we find this language illustrative: whatever models or predictions may have said about the abilities of a company’s products to perform under XYZ conditions or PQR constraints, at the end of the day all that matters for the thousands of families who purchase and rely upon that device is that the produce function and that any users’ safety be preserved. We bring the same philosophy to bear in cases involving defective baby car seats.

So far in this series, we have considered the role a child car seat plays in preventing a small occupant’s injuries in the event of a Nevada automobile accident, and we have looked at several common design flaws that affect these products. Conscientious shoppers can make use our our Nevada accident and injury lawyer Web site to learn more about car seats that are currently under scrutiny for faulty designs and to stay informed about other important Las Vegas product liability issues. In this final post in our series, we want to turn our attention to several of the most common — and most tragic — examples of failure in Nevada child car seat injuries.

If a child car seat cannot maintain its form and primary functions in the event of a crash, what good can it do? We often see cases in which a car seat would have or might have offered adequate protection from injury in an accident but instead the seat itself became compromised mid-crash. Bad designs are made worse when flimsy trays break off from the primary seat, head-guards snap and become hazards, and restraints slip from their guides and either fail to secure the child or else pose risks of strangulation. Further, no amount of thoughtfulness or safety features can make up for a failure of structural integrity in a child car seat. In the 50-plus years that the child car seat industry has been evolving, numerous studies have identified key design aspects that must inform the creation of any new child restraint product. Many designs make use of head-guards that attempt to protect a child occupant from dangerous lateral movement of the head in a crash. But if these guards are not properly designed or lined with protective padding, a safety feature becomes a safety hazard. Other designs adequately restrain a child’s body but neglect to consider the head, in some cases permitting forward movement of the head that is beyond federal guidelines and which poses an acute risk of severe spinal cord and neck injury. Care should also be taken when designing how the child car seat will connect with the vehicle: snap-in designs where the car seat attaches to another piece by plastic clips sacrifice safety for convenience of use, as do models that do not utilize some form of tether strap or other failsafe anchor. These designs may help manufacturers sell more products, but putting profits ahead of protection is not a good tradeoff for society.

If your child has been harmed in a Nevada automobile accident, your head is likely swirling with a mountain of details. Unfortunately, the aggressive pace of today’s personal injury litigation also means that you are being asked to make decisions quickly even where you have little primary experience or unbiased information to draw upon. Our firm believes in providing excellent service to our Las Vegas personal injury victims, and we offer free consultations to allow Nevadans to get a baseline orientation so they can begin making these hard choices. Call us today for an appointment.

Share and Enjoy

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Delicious
  • LinkedIn
  • StumbleUpon
  • Add to favorites
  • Email
  • RSS

Design flaws in child safety seats create threats, product liability

April 24th, 2011 No comments

We continue our look at the crashworthiness of child safety seats in the event  of a Nevada motor vehicle accident. In future posts we will investigate how the choice of a car seat can be influenced by the vehicle it is to be used in and by the size and weight of the child to be restrained. Today, we want to take a closer look at design features and flaws that can have significant impacts on the functioning of child car seats in the event of a collision.

Study after study has found that the best, safest type of restraint is a “five-point” harness, so called because there are five separate anchor points that hold the child in the seat. The five-point harness is the safety standard because it minimizes the risk of ejection in the event of a car accident and because it holds the child’s body in a stable position that lowers the risk of injury due to acceleration forces during a crash. (Of note: five-point harnesses are similar to the safety restraints used by race-car drivers.) Despite this body of evidence that the five-point harness is the safest design for these seats, some manufacturers continue to use outdated, unsafe child safety seats with one- and three-point restraints. In the event that a child is killed during an automobile accident where the child safety seat in use lacked a five-point harness, a wrongful death lawsuit is one of several options for legal redress.

Some alternative designs attempt to provide additional points of restraint while offering increased “functionality” with features such as tray shields. A child car seat tray shield typically rotates over the child’s lap and/or clips into place over the child’s waist. But when these trays are insufficiently padded or if they break off during a collision, a handy feature can become a lethal projectile. Studies have shown that traumatic head forces affecting a child passenger in a car seat with a tray can be more than four-thirds those seen a five-point harness. Another feature intended to facilitate ease of use is the T-shield, which is a plastic shield that encloses the occupant from the front while securing the child to the rest of the seat and to the automobile’s car seat. In the case of a crash, the T-shield can become a threat to the occupant by placing intense pressures on the child’s throat and increasing forces on the tissues in the back that can lead to back and spinal cord injury.

The emphasis on child safety seats was a major advance in the technology of automobile safety, but the gains from this progress are lost when manufacturers put profits ahead of research and make unsafe products. If your child has been injured in an automobile accident and you believe that the child safety seat failed to perform its stated role, contact us today. Our experienced Nevada child car seat defect lawyers will help you understand what elements of the seat you utilized might have been faulty and we will help you understand your legal options.

 

Share and Enjoy

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Delicious
  • LinkedIn
  • StumbleUpon
  • Add to favorites
  • Email
  • RSS

Defects in Evenflo, other child car seats raise crashworthiness issues

April 19th, 2011 No comments

It’s not often that you hear the utterance, “a lawyer’s work is never done.” Then again, there aren’t many places online to find continuous, relevant commentary on important Las Vegas personal injury issues. (Hint: you’re at one of them!) At Benson & Bingham, our motto is that “Experience is the Difference.” Each family we represent is both (1) a client for whom we fight to ensure a settlement or Nevada jury award that restores losses suffered by another’s negligence and (2) a new data point in a model that builds upon every success. We represent our clients with our eyes open so that each new case benefits from the hundreds that have preceded it.

This experience comes to bear most profoundly when we handle Nevada defective product lawsuits such as those involving child car seats. In this informational mini-series, we want to explore some of the most common issues that arise in Las Vegas defective car seat cases. Our hope is that this information will help families already affected by these tragic betrayals of trust to better understand the legal elements of a possible lawsuit and guide them toward effective legal representation. Hopefully, this same body of information will help other readers to avoid the use of potentially dangerous models of child safety restraints.

Forgive us for beginning with the obvious, but a basic principle will be key to this analysis: child safety seats are first and foremost supposed to keep children safe in the event of a motor vehicle accident, automobile rollover, or other adverse car incident. If a child car seat fails to do this — by allowing a child to be ejected from the vehicle, by failing to prevent a child from being harmed by interior parts of the vehicle, or by the device itself inflicting injury upon the child — it has failed as a safety device and your trust in it to protect your child has been betrayed. An experienced Nevada car seat accident attorney knows that this is the key lens through which these cases should be analyzed, and you should seek out legal representation that will focus on the device’s theoretical and empirical functioning in the vital role of protecting its precious occupants.

In the coming installments, we will analyze some common design flaws that continue to exist today even though research and a body of tragic evidence has shown them to be dangerous. We hope that you will stick with us as we explore this important information. If you need legal answers now that relate to a defective child car seat or any other personal injury legal matter, contact us today for a free consultation at one of our two Las Vegas offices.

Share and Enjoy

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Delicious
  • LinkedIn
  • StumbleUpon
  • Add to favorites
  • Email
  • RSS

Trench collapse is a grim reminder of Nevada gold mine collapse injuries

April 17th, 2011 No comments

When television specials profile the “most dangerous jobs in America” or other spins on the same theme, they often focus on sectors with new and powerful technologies such as off-shore oil drilling, chemical production, and cutting-edge construction projects where the risk of death or spinal cord injury lurks constantly and can strike in a moment. Other tabulations of employment risks focus on lower-level risks that are faced on a daily basis, such as is experienced by firefighters and police officers. Often forgotten are the jobs that now seem mundane, such as agriculture and mining. But as a recent trench collapse accident shows, the risks of working underground are as serious as they were hundreds of years ago.

A 42-year-old man took a temporary job on a construction site where his responsibilities were supposed to be digging several shallow trenches. When the man arrived on-site, he was instead assigned to a deep trench (about six feet deep) where he was supposed to lay pipe. The trench was narrower than it was deep, and much of the dirt that had been excavated was laid at the opening to the trench. While the worker was in the trench, the walls collapsed partially and buried the man up to his waist. A subsequent collapse that occurred before the man was rescued trapped him further. The weight of the soil put immense pressure on the man’s body, collapsing one of his lungs, damaging a kidney, and requiring a week of intensive-care hospitalization and some $200,000 in medical expenses.

Humans have been mining minerals from the ground since Biblical times, some 6,000 or more years ago. The risk of mine collapse accidents has always been a factor in this activity, and as the scale and scope of mining has expanded we have developed technologies and methods to reduce the risks and increase the benefits. Many observers point to the deplorable coal-mining industry that fuels China’s rapid growth at the cost of hundreds of lives each year, but the reality is that mining is still risky business even today. We all remember the Upper Big Branch coal mine explosion last year, and there was also the story of the trapped miners in Chile.

One type of mining accident stands out, however, in terms of its disproportionate effect on a small number of individuals. Accidents from coal mining and other precious-metals mining are spread out somewhat evenly over the country’s regions and variance is mostly due to chance. But when it comes to gold mining, Nevadans clearly bear the brunt of the risk. Some 93 percent of the nation’s gold mining accidents in 2009 occurred in our state, resulting in more than 60 Nevada workplace injuries.

Surely this is in part related to the fact that Nevada has the nation’s largest supply of gold and in fact the state is one of the largest producers of gold in the world.  But the reality is also that the mining industry has successfully used its largesse to ally with powerful political interests and seek out preferential treatment. At the state level, mining taxes are constitutionally capped at only five percent; lawmakers are now contemplating beginning a five-year plan to change this which will involve passing a repeal of this exemption in two legislative sessions and then gaining voter approval. At the federal level, the Nevada gold mining industry has been able to leverage its singularly productive and lucrative position to avoid major scrutiny by mine regulators, allowing it to put its workers’ health at risk with virtual impunity.

If you or a loved one have been harmed in a Nevada mining accident, contact us today for a free consultation. Our experienced Las Vegas mining accident lawyers are familiar with the major issues in this field and can help you build a strong case related to the unique factors in your situation. We have two Clark County personal injury law offices to serve you.

Share and Enjoy

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Delicious
  • LinkedIn
  • StumbleUpon
  • Add to favorites
  • Email
  • RSS

Las Vegas news organization blames FAA for sleepy controllers and airplane accident near-misses

April 13th, 2011 No comments

Could it be all the crummy reruns of “Frasier” that is causing the recent epidemic of sleepy airplane staff? In the last year and a half, there have been at least three major, public instances of vital air travel staff nodding off in the midst of their duties. First, there was a pair of Northwest Airlines pilots who bypassed Minneapolis in late 2009. Many suspect that they may have fallen asleep, although the pilots maintain that they were distracted by an intense discussion. This year alone, air traffic controllers working the overnight shift at Tennessee and Washington, D.C. airports have gone out of contact after falling asleep. Another incident in Nevada now has observers worried about the risk of Nevada air accidents as a result of sleepy staffers.

For 16 minutes, the lone controller at the Reno-Tahoe International Airport was out of radio contact with a medical flight that had to land last night. Thankfully, the pilot successfully landed the aircraft without injury to the patient or medical crew, but it was a close call in what could have been a devastating Nevada accident. With at least three reports of dozing traffic controllers in just four months, the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) is calling for swift action.

But as a Las Vegas television station points out, these incidents can be blamed on FAA policies that have put pressure on air traffic control towers to downsize. Many airports across the country now have only one person on staff during overnight shifts, although this wave of sensational incidents is likely to result in a two-person minimum policy going forward.

A spate of near-misses in possible air accidents over the last few months may have numbed us to the harsh reality of these accidents. In the case of landings botched due to insufficient control-tower guidance, passengers can be flung around large airplane fuselages and can suffer a range of harms including spinal cord injuries; when flights encounter trouble at high elevation or accelerated speed, the chances of survival are minute and these cases become matters of assessing blame and seeking damages for wrongful death. If you or a loved one have suffered a Nevada air accident injury and want to learn more about your legal rights, contact our Las Vegas personal injury attorneys today for a free consultation.

Share and Enjoy

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Delicious
  • LinkedIn
  • StumbleUpon
  • Add to favorites
  • Email
  • RSS

Nevada schools struggle to graduate students, avoid personal injury lawsuits

April 10th, 2011 No comments

According to the Institute for Economics and Peace‘s first-ever “United States Peace Index,” Nevada is the third-ranking most violent state in the country. The group’s report — and its underlying methodology — is still being digested by the public policy community, but some of the data speak for themselves: Nevada does have among the highest rates of violent crimes and homicides per capita among U.S. states, and on a national basis we are better at putting people in jail than getting them to graduate from high school with a diploma. These figures are a sober reminder to policy makers that Nevada schools need to improve rather than just hold the line, either of which is a difficult prospect in the face of a wounded economy and a desire to keep taxes and other sources of revenue at a minimum. As a few recent personal injury lawsuits show, these same factors also put schools at greater risk of facing legal action.

In reality, it is difficult for educational institutions to avoid Nevada school negligence lawsuits. With hundreds or even thousands of students, dozens of teachers and staff, and a wide range of activities mingling all at once, every sour combination brings the possibility of legal trouble. In a recent case, a girl was walking through a crowded hallway between classes and was shoved into a wall. Whether it was intentional or not, it had a serious effect: the girl lost consciousness, owing in part to an unusual heart condition. A teacher alerted administrators of an emergency but paramedics were not called for another seven minutes. The girl ended up dying in the hospital, and her surviving family members successfully sued the school for failure to act in a reasonably fast manner to address the emergency and for failing to supervise the passing period that resulted in the injury. The parties settled for about three-quarters of a million dollars.

As the case above shows, schools can be held accountable for inaction. In the case of public schools where compulsory education requires students’ attendance, schools occupy a unique role as public institutions. This position has been held to include certain special duties to provide for the welfare of students attending school, and staff and faculty failure to act can be as problematic as taking the wrong steps. There is, of course, plenty of potential for problematic actions as well. In addition to student-on-student violence, schools can also carry enormous liability for the actions of staff or faculty whose interactions with students are sexual, violent, or otherwise inappropriate.

Another common source of public school injury lawsuits is school sports and specialty classes such as metal shop or physical education. Schools often try to limit their exposure to liability by requiring students and parents to sign wide-ranging liability waivers before taking part in certain classes and field trips that involve heightened risk of injury. A recent lawsuit concluded in a jury award of more than $100,000 after a man was injured in a gymnasium. Many schools have to make multiple uses of gymnasiums and basketball courts, sometimes cramming two or more physical education classes into one space or separating two different functions — floor hockey and basketball, or p.e. class and band practice — with some kind of temporary divider. In this case, the divider separating two parts of the basketball court was a large net, which was too tall for the room and which draped down to the ground in a pile. A basketball player tried to field the ball near this part of the court and became entangled in the net, ultimately suffering a tear to his meniscus and a sprained ankle. When he sued for damages, he was ultimately able to recover compensation for his medical expenses and for the negligent way in which the net was suspended.

Another tragic case is that of a young football player whose season and quality of life were cut short due to a school football injury. The boy was a new addition to a school’s varsity football team when he was put in a game early in the season. Playing defense, the boy attempted to tackle an opposing player who was carrying the football; the boy lowered his head and rammed the other student, resulting in a spinal cord injury that left him a quadriplegic. Once a promising high school football player, the boy is now immobilized and requires 24-hour supervision and care. The boy’s family sued the school district, alleging that it was negligent in failing to properly train him and in allowing the athlete to play in a game before he had completed at least ten practices as is required by policy. His medical expenses alone exceeded $500,000 at the time of trial, and the boy’s family and the school district ultimately settled for a confidential amount.

When we send our children to public schools, we have high hopes for what they will gain. We hope they will learn and will build their social skills; we hope they will mature into better, brighter people. These hopes rest with us as parents and members of a community, but we are not the only responsible parties. We also expect that our children will come home to us each day safely and at least as healthy as they were when they left in the morning. If your child has suffered an injury at school and you want to learn more about your legal rights, contact our Las Vegas public school accident attorneys today for a free consultation.

Share and Enjoy

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Delicious
  • LinkedIn
  • StumbleUpon
  • Add to favorites
  • Email
  • RSS

Unanswered questions after Reno shooting: self-defense or Nevada wrongful death?

A community is reeling and police are still gathering facts after a shooting in a usually quiet neighborhood in Reno, Nevada earlier this week. It is still too early to definitively characterize the incident, but initial reports suggest that there may have been a misunderstanding that resulted in a tragic Nevada accident.

Reports suggest that a homeowner in the neighborhood confronted a vehicle full of teens that was driving up and down the street in a quiet, middle-class neighborhood in Northern Nevada’s largest city. When some of the youths approached the man, he apparently shot at least one of them, causing a fatal injury. The man claims that the teens were threatening him and that he shot in self-defense.

Self-defense claims are always a controversial part of the legal landscape, and it is sometimes impossible to say which of two (or more) conflicting stories is closest to the truth. There is substantial court precedent to support a presumption of self-defense when a home invader is shot inside a resident’s home, as is often the case when attempted burglaries turn into fatal shootings. This case seems to be of a different nature, with the shooter apparently feeling threatened but choosing to leave his home to a public space where he shot an alleged assailant.

The investigation of this tragedy will be crucial in determining the outcome of this case. It is possible that criminal charges will be dropped or beaten by the shooter if preliminary reports are borne out in trial, but there is still a possibility that the family of the slain youth would seek a Nevada wrongful death lawsuit against the man. This type of lawsuit is common where criminal prosecution and other recourse is not available to the surviving family of a person killed in an accident, defective product, or other unexpected, avoidable loss. If you have questions about pursuing a wrongful death action, contact our Las Vegas personal injury lawyers today for a free consultation and an introduction to this complicated part of the law.

Share and Enjoy

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Delicious
  • LinkedIn
  • StumbleUpon
  • Add to favorites
  • Email
  • RSS